Dragon Ball Daima continues to surprise fans with its bold narrative choices and unique twists, but its latest episode, where Kid Vegeta transforms into Super Saiyan 3, has sparked heated debates among the fandom. While undeniably a thrilling moment and a feast for fans seeking nostalgia and excitement, this transformation raises significant canon issues, particularly in relation to Dragon Ball Super.
Vegeta Super Saiyan 3: A Canonical Gap
In Dragon Ball Z, Goku is the only Saiyan to achieve Super Saiyan 3, a form that comes with immense power but at the cost of stamina and energy. Vegeta, on the other hand, skipped this transformation entirely, opting for other forms like Super Saiyan 2’s perfected version and later Super Saiyan God and Blue in Dragon Ball Super. The rationale behind Vegeta not using Super Saiyan 3 was attributed to the form’s inefficiency in prolonged combat and the character’s preference for controlled, sustainable power-ups. By introducing a Kid Vegeta who can effortlessly tap into Super Saiyan 3, Dragon Ball Daima contradicts the established narrative and undermines the logical progression of Vegeta’s power evolution.
Moreover, the events of Dragon Ball Daima are set in a timeline that bridges the gap between Dragon Ball Z and Dragon Ball Super. If Kid Vegeta could achieve Super Saiyan 3 during this period, why is there no mention of it in Dragon Ball Super? Kid Vegeta’s Super Saiyan 3 form appears incredibly powerful, rivaling even some of the series’ adult warriors. This creates confusion about how powerful Vegeta is supposed to be during the events of Dragon Ball Super, where he doesn’t use Super Saiyan 3 despite facing threats like Frieza, Goku Black, and Jiren.
Dragon Ball Daima – Fan Service vs. Storytelling
It’s undeniable that Vegeta achieving Super Saiyan 3 is a dream come true for many fans who’ve long wished to see him unlock this iconic form. The scene feels tailor-made for fan service, providing an exhilarating visual spectacle and paying homage to Vegeta’s enduring popularity. However, catering to fan desires without considering narrative consequences can backfire. While moments like these generate excitement, they risk alienating viewers who value coherent storytelling and character development over fleeting thrills. Striking the right balance between fan service and a consistent storyline is crucial to maintaining the franchise’s credibility. Due to this, some fans genuinely worry that maybe they actually bring in Super Saiyan 4, which would create further canonical gaps.
Is Dragon Ball Daima Retcon or Alternate Timeline?
The introduction of Kid Vegeta’s Super Saiyan 3 form also raises questions about whether Dragon Ball Daima exists in an alternate timeline. If it’s not part of the main continuity, the transformation could be excused as a creative liberty. However, Dragon Ball Daima has been marketed as a bridge between Dragon Ball Z and Dragon Ball Super, making the lack of coherence harder to justify.
While Kid Vegeta’s Super Saiyan 3 transformation in Dragon Ball Daima is an exciting spectacle and a nod to fan dreams, it creates significant canon issues that Dragon Ball Super will need to address. Whether it’s through retcons, alternate timelines, or further explanations, the Dragon Ball franchise must tread carefully to maintain the integrity of its beloved narrative. Fans can only hope that future episodes of Dragon Ball Daima will shed light on how this transformation fits into the broader Dragon Ball story—or if it’s merely a creative anomaly meant to entertain rather than expand the canon.
If you have any questions regarding the Dragon Ball Daima, feel free to ask in the comments below and stay tuned. As usual, like, subscribe and share our articles as we here are trying to build a community of people High on Cinema!
